As a foreigner I didn’t really grow up watching this show, so I might sound confused/ignorant, but I definitely feel like this piece left a
lasting impression on me about Rogers and the love people felt for him. Whenever
Mr Rogers is talked about, there is a firm persona of a spectator used, someone
who sees Mr Rogers but never takes on his voice or train of thought. Hence the
way Mr Rogers looks and acts has the most description out of any character, keeping
him firmly as an object of awe. We side with the narrator as just another one
of the crowd. Mr Rogers becomes an enigma, like a ‘God’ who ‘just’ does these
amazing things that people look up to and wish they had. On top of all this, he
is modest about these traits in comparison to the desperate, wishful voices in
many of the other characters. This distances him from us at the beginning of
the narrative until he actually starts crouching down to the crowd in New York
against his manager’s wishes, and asking the narrator inquisitive questions in
the interview.
Mr Rogers is not a weary, confused character. The
narrator is in awe of him and the control he has over his life, which is
something a lot of us lack (can you say superpower?). There is a mixing of perception between the
narrator and Mr Rogers which becomes clearer as the profile goes on. This is
intertwined to the story through the fairy tale phrase ‘Once upon a time’. The narrator sometimes sounds naïve, or makes
the reader sound young by explaining what things are such as an architect. This
keeps the narrative true to Mr Rogers preoccupation with children. We get very
engaged in this fairy tale until the swear words come in and snap us out of the
childish gaze. The mixed voices in the text really keep the essay alive, like Mr Rogers in the hearts of many.
No comments:
Post a Comment