An important factor in character development for me is
voice. How a person speaks, and interacts with other people tells us a lot
about their values and sadly, their social background. For instance, Arnold
Friend sprung up as a threat in my mind when I saw how he talked to Connie
condescendingly in ‘Where are you going?’. Using terms like ‘baby’ a lot,
especially to women/girls, infantilises them and sounds patronising; creating a
false feeling of intimacy. He was a hideous character, but so very well
written.
Another good technique for character development is
detail. For instance, in ‘Silver Water’, Amy Bloom writes that ‘all the
patients wore slippers with the hospital crest on them’, and I know exactly how
miserable it is, where all the patients just mesh into one. This is not
specifically applied to a character, but the repetition of the slippers is like
a symbol for the dullness of the place, and we realise it’s not good for the colourful
Rose in the eyes of her loving sister. In this we also learn that Violet feels like
an observer in the family, in which Rose is ‘the favourite’, but she doesn’t object
to it.
It is very fitting when conflict come from character, for
instance in ‘Bullet in the Brain’. The downfall of Anders is his smart mouth.
He can’t stop being a critic to the very end. This technique probably works the
best in short stories, where you don’t want to get too caught up in different
struggles. Also, it gives the story some kind of moralistic purpose, we can
look at the protagonist’s defeats in light of our own. Actually I find writing
character a lot easier than making up conflict, so I look forward to how I can
advance my plots and make them more interesting.
Meera, I completely agree with you in your analysis of what makes of good character development. Voice is one that allows us to relate, understand, and empathize with a character. It also allows for us gain a lot of clarity on who this person is, what they like and dislike, and what makes them unique. I also agree with your analysis of Anders' problem and the unfortunate short comings that came from his otherwise sullen angry, and sarcastic demeanor. The conflict that arose from the voice of this character definitely led us into the thought process and direction that he deserved it and that this was his fault. Which was such a great technique to use.
ReplyDeleteMeera, I completely agree with you in your analysis of what makes of good character development. Voice is one that allows us to relate, understand, and empathize with a character. It also allows for us gain a lot of clarity on who this person is, what they like and dislike, and what makes them unique. I also agree with your analysis of Anders' problem and the unfortunate short comings that came from his otherwise sullen angry, and sarcastic demeanor. The conflict that arose from the voice of this character definitely led us into the thought process and direction that he deserved it and that this was his fault. Which was such a great technique to use.
ReplyDelete